Review page for Data Source Naming

This page is used to manage the review of the spec for Data Source Naming .

The value of this approach is that it allows me to track all the issues separately and to drive them to resolution. For me email reviews although nice and informal are almost impossible to track to conclusion. Inline comments to the main document muddy up the document and are also difficult to track to conclusion.

The review process works like this:

• Add a comment header of the format "Comment <initials>-<number> (<status>)" (see below for examples)
• A discussion then can take place under that comment header
• Each comment will have a status at the top, with the status set to Approved, Accepted PDU (pending doc update) or Unresolved
• If necessary, we do more rounds of discussion until the item is marked as Approved

Commenter Initials Key

• JWB - JohnBaker

Feedback

JWB-1

This is an example comment